In other places with many sources of infection it could possibly have been a little more.

You will also face the climate crisis, protect the health of Americans and create jobs. In addition, women’s rights should be protected, the right to vote strengthened and structural racism eradicated in the US judicial system, Harris said. Shortly after Biden and Harris left the stage, Trump stepped onto the podium for a press conference in the White House – the third in three days. He first showed graphs showing, among other things, growth in the stock market and a recovery in demand for cars. «  » We’re doing incredibly well, « he said again. Meanwhile, Europe experienced 40 percent higher excess mortality than the USA during the Corona crisis. « We are working with Europe on their difficulties, » said Trump. He only reacted to the attacks by Biden and Harris late at the hour-long meeting.

No, he did not look at their appearances, only looked briefly, Trump replied to a reporter question. He recalled that, unlike Harris, he had made it through the primary campaign as a presidential candidate: «  » She went under like a stone. I don’t. «  » And like the day before, he accused Harris of not being sincere because she used to criticize Biden and now praise: «  » She said worse things about Biden than I ever did. «  » Hidden tip For Biden Trump had a hidden tip for Biden himself. « When you sit in the basement at home and stare at the computer, the brain starts to wither, » he said when it came to studying at home instead of at school.

Trump had repeatedly mentioned in the past few days that Biden was sitting in the basement in Wilmington and had to come out there. Because of the corona pandemic, Biden had initially made the election campaign largely from an improvised television studio in his basement. Source: ntv.de, Andrej Sokolow and Lena Klimkeit, dpa « Chancellor Merkel called Seehofer’s criticism of the taz column an » absolute correct reaction «  ». (Photo: dpa) The controversial taz column, Brexit, the Nord Stream 2 pipeline – these are just a few of the topics on which Chancellor Merkel is being asked in the Bundestag. A delicate confrontation between two also attracts attention NATO warships in the Mediterranean. During a question time in the Bundestag, Chancellor Angela Merkel defended the approach taken by Interior Minister Horst Seehofer in the dispute over a taz column, warned against the failure of the Brexit negotiations and commented on numerous other issues, including the dispute over the Nord Stream 2 pipeline; and an incident in the Mediterranean in which a Turkish warship behaved aggressively towards a French one In the dispute over a police-critical taz column, which had caused outrage because of a comparison between garbage and police officers, the former CDU leader said in response to a question from the AfD that Seehofer had the support of the entire federal government.biology essay help service You think it is the «  » absolutely correct reaction «  » to stand behind the police officers and at the same time seek conversation.

It is «  » extremely worrying «  » that attacks on the police have increased. In the taz column, which was probably meant to be satirical, it was in connection with allegations of racism about a possible abolition of the police. The author had also written that in the end, previous police officers would best be kept in a «  » garbage dump «  » as a workplace. Seehofer then announced that he would file a complaint about the column, but then backtracked. Merkel believes that the negotiations between the EU and Great Britain on a trade agreement for the period after the currently applicable Brexit transition period will fail. « We should take precautions in the event that the agreement does not come about, » she said. It is true that during the German EU Council Presidency she will continue to «  » campaign for a good solution, « said Merkel.

But the progress in the negotiations so far is «  » very clear, to put it cautiously. If there is no agreement by the end of the year, the customs barriers will go down in mutual trade – this would be a further burden for the economy, which was already shaken by the Corona crisis. In the dispute over the Baltic Sea pipeline Nord Stream 2, Merkel criticized the sanctions of the USA and promised to work towards the completion of the project. In the government survey in the Bundestag, the Chancellor said that the project had not only economic but also political implications.

That is why the federal government has advocated a transit gas contract with Ukraine for the next few years so that the country is not cut off from the transit of Russian gas and thus also from the income from transit fees. «  » We believe, however, that the nature of the extra-territorial sanctions as they are imposed by the United States of America, does not correspond to our understanding of the law, and thus also not the current deliberations, «  » said Merkel in the Bundestag with a view to the planned further US sanctions. «  » Nevertheless, one has to admit that the construction process is becoming more difficult. We still believe that it is right to finish this project. And that’s the way we act. «  » The SPD has called for sanctions against the USA if, as planned, they not only impose sanctions on the companies involved in the construction of the gas pipeline, but also service providers, insurance companies and authorities involved in the project .

Critics in the US and Eastern Europe accuse the operators of Nord Stream 2 that the project would jeopardize Europe’s energy security. She described a confrontation between ships of NATO partners France and Turkey in the Mediterranean as a very serious incident. « NATO is investigating what happened there, » said Merkel. It is now a matter of doing everything possible to ensure that such incidents do not recur among NATO member states. «  » This is very serious, « said Merkel. According to information from Paris, a Turkish warship had repeatedly aimed its fire control radar at a French frigate. Since such systems are usually only used to provide target data for the use of weapons systems, this was considered by France as «  » extremely aggressive «  » and addressed at the most recent NATO defense ministerial meeting. Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg announced that the incident of June 10 was now being investigated by the NATO military authorities. She was also open to a quota for women on the boards of listed companies, affirmed the planned abolition of work contracts in the meat industry and defended the rescue Lufthansa and pointed out that it should be run in a market economy and that the state wanted to keep its influence low.

The left had criticized the government for not doing enough to protect jobs. Merkel also pointed out that the danger from the coronavirus was still so great that the so-called epidemic situation could not be declared over. This secures special rights for the federal government in a pandemic situation. Merkel warned that work should continue to be concentrated on containing the virus. She is «  » not calm «  » in view of the situation. Source: ntv.de, vpe / AFP / dpa / DJ / rts « After 2007, Merkel is leading Germany through an EU Council Presidency again. (Photo: dpa) Biggest economic crisis since the second World War I, the first German EU Council Presidency in 13 years, the Chancellor’s last, decisive months .. Who would not say that Angela Merkel has big and new plans, yes, has to?

Well, definitely not one of them: Merkel herself. Angela Merkel is quite alien to pathos and the longing for the last big final chord, and no, she will not reinvent herself, as it has often been said. Merkel’s central theme in governing is … governing itself. For 15 years, referring to Europe, this has meant: When there is a crisis, the nation states take the wheel alone, the EU Commission may assist. Bigger steps towards «  » more Europe  » « , in the direction of integration and increasing statehood of the Brussels authorities? Merkel has always shied away from this because she has remained true to her notoriously skeptical European maxim: If a nation state has a problem, it can affect many EU members because of the networking via the internal market and the euro. Nevertheless, the solution does not come from Brussels from the EU, but, if at all, from the affected nation state and its government itself.

Angela Merkel only acted differently, « more European », when it seemed absolutely irrefutable. In her words: «  » no alternative «  ». That was the case during her first EU Council Presidency in 2007: the far-reaching EU constitution had just failed in two referendums in France and the Netherlands, and the EU was in a crisis of meaning. Merkel pushed through pragmatic compromises within six months. The less ambitiously titled «  » Treaty of Lisbon «  » nonetheless deepened EU integration in many places.

It became the new business foundation of the European Union and is still today. Only once more, after the financial and economic crisis of 2008/09, saw Merkel «  » without any alternative «  » being forced to shift competencies in the direction of Brussels: the EMS euro rescue package, the banking union and the European community supervision of the large,  » « Systemically important » « money houses came on the way. Merkel’s line would not have changed much in the next six months either, the program of the German Council Presidency was fixed, and France’s head of state Emmanuel Macron would have stuck to Merkel’s stubborn resistance for the last time with his much more far-reaching plans for Europe different, because there is no other way, as the German Chancellor now believes, and she is probably right. The corona pandemic has hit the world and Europe like a natural disaster, the clean-up work is becoming expensive. Refusing financial aid to certain euro countries in the past because, for example, they do not have their pension systems under control or continue to live beyond their means – that is one thing, and Merkel did not care about being very unpopular in these countries.

But refusing financial aid to other euro countries if they find themselves in dire straits through no fault of their own – that is something else. That can tear the euro apart first and then the rest of the EU. The Chancellor has therefore crossed one of her few «  » red lines «  », she is now promoting jointly guaranteed debts, which the EU Commission is taking on for the first time, at least 500 billion euros.

This is a taboo violation that will soon also occupy the Federal Constitutional Court. Whether the Germans and some other payer nations will make their peace with the expensive plans is open. It will depend especially on Angela Merkel and on the question of whether a majority will relieve her for the last time of the «  » lack of alternatives «  » that she argues. In the refugee crisis of 2015/16 she did not succeed.

That depends on the Chancellor to this day. Paradox: As one will experience after the next federal election, Angela Merkel is by no means «  » without alternative «  » for Germany. But it is a functioning Europe. Helmut Kohl enforced the euro in this way, Angela Merkel will have to save him in this way. Source: ntv.de « RKI Vice Schaade warns the population to continue to be disciplined. The number of infections is rising again. Around one in three cases are now among those returning home.

RKI Vice Schaade sees no room for further relaxation of the restrictions. The findings of a new antibody study are a ray of hope.ntv: Professor Schaade, before we talk about the study, let’s take a quick look at Bavaria, at the test breakdown. How worried you are? And what does that mean for our infection rate? Lars Schaade: We at the Robert Koch Institute are naturally interested in having the most complete data possible. How many tests are carried out?

How many of them are positive? The task for us as the RKI is to collect these numbers. And if the numbers are incomplete, then that’s not good for the overall picture, no question about it.

On the other hand, I also have some understanding that in the first few days of a new procedure, these numbers and data do not flow smoothly from the start. Let’s take a look at the study that you presented in Kupferzell today. The place was one of the first corona hotspots in the country. What kind of evidence did the study unearth? There are some findings that are very interesting. For example, how many people have actually been infected with the virus.

That is about eight percent and thus four times more than was previously known from the reporting offices. On the other hand, it is not the majority of the population who became infected, although Kupferzell was severely affected, but only a little under ten percent. In other places with many sources of infection it could possibly have been a little more.

That means: even if the action is violent, it is still worth taking action. Because the majority of the population is not infected. And these measures work, because the infection process here in Kupferzell came to a standstill a few weeks later. Let’s take a look at the infection process across Germany. The numbers are currently increasing again relatively rapidly. This is certainly also due to returning travelers.

Do you think we allowed too much easing too soon? That’s a tough question. The returning travelers are of course a problem at the moment. About 30 percent of the cases that we are currently receiving are from travelers returning home. But this also shows that the majority of the transmissions are in Germany.

Here too we have to react accordingly. It was a declared goal to reduce the measures so far that the best possible social life is possible again and the virus infections still remain under control. A measure or relaxation must therefore be carried out step by step.

Politicians have done this very successfully for many weeks. Are we threatened with a second lockdown? I think we must at least take note that the point for more easing has been clearly exceeded. We have this transference again, and we also have to think about where we can tighten the screws so that social life is affected as little as possible. But we can recapture this excess effect that we are now seeing with the increase in the number of cases.